how can people here place an opinion when no one has even used it yet? I wouldn t judge something until it has been released it and i have used it
Windows 7 is the working name for the next major version of Microsoft Windows as the successor of Windows Vista. Microsoft has announced that it is quot;scoping Windows 7 development to a three-year timeframequot;, and that Windows 7 is expected to be released sometime in 2010. You can say goodbye to anything based on WinXp for good even though WinXp ran older games fine and was much more stable than Vista, which is what Windows7 is going to based on.
quot;yay... here comes another windows vistaquot; i am hoping that was some sarcasm there. Anyway, windows 7... if it is going to be something like XP, maybe called XP2 sp1 or something. i hate vista. or maybe ms has partnered with mac and they are shipping a cloned mac to vistas newest cousin?
Well, I ve read they re planning to come out with one in a few years called Windows Vienna, and it sounds just like Vista. Hopefully by then, Vista will be really upgraded and people will like it more.
I m really betting here that it is going to fall on it s face again... they, supposedly, are going to base it on the vista kernel, meaning vista drivers, and since the drivers are the weakest link, aside from HORRIBLE performance... I don t think there s much chance we re going to get a FAST and STABLE OS out of it... It will likely be just a minor re-hash of vista... The same idiots who developed vista, thinking they needed an OS who s display was as cool as some of the games being played on it, are aparently still in charge at mickey-soft. They haven t learned yet, that the reason that vista has flopped in the corporate setting, and had filtered down to home users being leery of the product is because it s a bad performing DOG. Neither businesses, nor most home users want their operating system to be quot;cutequot; at the expense of performance. Businesses, and the majority of thinking home users what an OS that loads in as absolutely minimal time as possible, that is responsive, and stable. Users don t want to spend time rebooting, or waiting for a quot;kewl fade inquot; or fade-out for every dialog box that comes up, they want the dialog box to not show up in the first place, if at all possible, and if it HAS to be asked, make it as quick as possible to get on with doing what it s supposed to do. If someone wants cute desktops and to sit around and watch their operating system perform tricks, and lessen their productivity, they already have a very stable choice to do so... It s called Mac OS-X. Microsoft reduced productivity to mac levels, without giving the user s the mac stability... That s like saying, well, our product kind of looks like a Ferrari... but it s performance level is just a tad closer to a moped, than the Ferrari. Users want their operating system to be: FAST, STABLE, SECURE, AFFORDABLE... Pretty much in that order. If it s not secure, it won t be stable, if it s fast but not stable, and you waste time rebooting, or worse-yet, typing a term paper and having the thing crash and loosing your last 8 hours of typing, you didn t really save any time, now, did you?
0 comments:
Post a Comment