I have tried it and it seems great :), I am using it, i believe its better then windows vista, before SP1, and its still in its beta !
I just downloaded 64 bit, I think it ll be a big step up from vista but i m not sure about resource use efficiency.
I wish that everyone had the in depth experience as a developer as I do and experience with other operating system. You would then realize that Microsoft, with its horrible software design inconsistencies, will never produce a good, stable, memory efficient OS. Just look at Vista internals: They are still using C, D, E drive etc. a holdover from CP/M the OS that DOS was built on that dates back to the late 70 s! When your file system gets corrupted what is used to correct it? Yeah the old DOS standby that DOS used to fix their missing quot;clustersquot; XP, Vista and even the new 7 are just more bloat on top of a crappy architecture to begin with. Graphically very pretty, but, functionality a pile of crap. Why do you think that most of the really important systems today are using a UNIX variant? Linux, BSD, OS X, etc. It s because UNIX is the most stable OS ON ... THE ... PLANET! Microsoft should ****-can all of their development, adopt a UNIX-like core and build a really good user interface. That s not likely because Microsoft is the king of tedious functionality. I could write 1,000 pages relating to the 10,000,000 million heartbeats Microsoft has stolen from me with BSD s, OS reinstalls, resetting settings in word and explore that don t stay set. etc.
the beta is already out, bud. go try it out ^^ http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows...
0 comments:
Post a Comment